What is the engine displacement of the 2015 Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS?

The 2015 Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS has an engine displacement of 695.0 ccm (42.41 cubic inches).

How much does the 2015 Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS weigh?

The 2015 Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS has a dry weight of 357.4 kg (788.0 pounds).

2015 Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS Price, Specs, Review

📖

Review

⌄

The 2015 Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS is a utility ATV engineered for both work and play. Powered by a 695cc engine, it offers sufficient grunt for a variety of tasks, from hauling materials to navigating challenging trails. The automatic transmission provides ease of use, enabling riders to focus on the terrain. The double A-arm front suspension contributes to a comfortable ride, absorbing bumps and maintaining stability. Braking is handled by hydraulic single disc brakes at the front. The 21.95-liter fuel tank offers a respectable range for extended use. Ergonomics are designed with the user in mind, offering a comfortable riding position for long hours. The inclusion of EPS (Electronic Power Steering) enhances maneuverability, particularly at lower speeds and on rough terrain. The TBX 700 EPS is geared towards riders who require a versatile ATV for both work and recreational purposes. Its cargo bed provides practical storage for tools or equipment, adding to its utility. In summary, the Arctic Cat TBX 700 EPS is a well-rounded ATV that balances utility with rider comfort. Its dependable engine, automatic transmission, and power steering make it a practical choice for those seeking a reliable workhorse that is also enjoyable to ride. The focus is on providing a user-friendly experience without sacrificing capability.

👍

Pros (Advantages)

⌄

✅ Why buy this bike?

• Excellent utility with large cargo racks and towing capacity, perfect for work or long trips. • Electronic Power Steering (EPS) significantly reduces steering effort, enhancing comfort and control on rough terrain. • Robust 695cc engine provides ample power and torque for hauling, climbing, and challenging trails. • Independent double A-arm suspension offers superior ride comfort and stability over varied terrain. • Durability and reliability are strong points, built to withstand harsh conditions and demanding use. • Good ground clearance helps navigate obstacles and uneven landscapes without bottoming out.

👎

Cons (Disadvantages)

⌄

⚠️ Things to consider

• Fuel efficiency can be a concern with the larger displacement engine, especially under heavy load. • Its larger size and weight can make it less nimble in very tight, technical trails compared to sportier ATVs. • Stock tires might not be optimal for all terrains; an upgrade could be necessary for specific uses. • Older model means potentially fewer available aftermarket parts compared to newer or more popular brands. • Maintenance can be more complex and costly due to the larger engine and utility-focused components.

🪪

License Class (EU)

⌄

Rule of thumb: under 125cc / 15HP → A1, under 47HP → A2, above → A.

⛽

Fuel Economy & Running Costs

⌄

Estimated average for 695cc class: 35-50 mpg (5.0-7.0 L/100km)

⛽ Tank: 21.95 litres (5.80 US gallons)

🛡️

Insurance Class

⌄

Insurance grouping for Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS (695cc):

📋 Group 15-20+ — performance class, higher premiums

🧮

Insurance Calculator (UK est.)

⌄

Personalised premium estimate for the Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS (UK rates):

💡 Estimate based on UK market averages. For real quotes, compare on Compare the Market, MoneySuperMarket, GoCompare.

💰

Price Estimate

⌄

Estimated price range for the Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS based on comparable motorcycles:

AVERAGE

$9,721

RANGE

$7,199 - $11,599

📊 average of 27 similar motorcycles · Approximate (USD)

🛒

Buy New & Used

⌄

Find new and used Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS 2015 listings:

🛒 eBay Motors 🏍️ Cycle Trader 🇬🇧 Auto Trader UK 🔍 Google Listings

💡 Third-party listings. MotoBike Info is informational only.

👤 Final premium varies by rider age, history, location.

Arctic Cat Cat TBX 700 EPS

Similar Motorcycles

Comparison Results