All Moto Models 1955 Motorcycles
User Rating
0.0/5
0 votes
✦ publish

Moto Guzzi Cardellino 65 Turismo

1955

Year1955
MakeMoto
Displacement64.0 ccm (3.91 cubic inches)
Moto Guzzi Cardellino 65 Turismo - No Image Available
📖
Review

The Moto Guzzi Cardellino 65 Turismo, released in 1955, represents an early foray into accessible motorcycling from the iconic Italian manufacturer. Positioned as an entry-level machine, the Cardellino 65 Turismo aimed to capture a segment of the market seeking affordable and reliable transportation. Competitors at the time included offerings from brands like Garelli and possibly the Lambretta 48, each vying for the attention of budget-conscious consumers.

Powering the Cardellino 65 Turismo is a modest but dependable engine. The single-cylinder, two-stroke engine displaces 64.0 ccm (3.91 cubic inches), providing adequate power for its intended purpose. With this engine, the Cardellino 65 Turismo could reach a top speed of 56.0 km/h (34.8 mph). Its lightweight design meant the engine didn't have to work too hard. The motorcycle's total weight is just 55.0 kg (121.3 pounds), improving the power-to-weight ratio.

Given its design, the Cardellino 65 Turismo offered a practical and upright riding position. The seat height was low, making it accessible for a wide range of riders. The suspension, while basic, provided a reasonable level of comfort on typical roads of the era. It was not designed for long-distance touring, but rather for short commutes and errands around town. The riding experience was simple and straightforward.

The Moto Guzzi Cardellino 65 Turismo was primarily targeted toward those seeking an economical and easy-to-manage motorcycle. Students, workers needing basic transportation, and those new to motorcycling would have found it appealing. While not a high-performance machine, it served its purpose reliably and affordably. It provided a stepping stone into the world of Moto Guzzi ownership.

👍
Pros (Advantages)

✅ Why buy this bike?

• Simple and robust engine design, making it relatively easy to maintain and repair, even with limited resources. • Lightweight and nimble handling, ideal for navigating narrow city streets and enjoying leisurely rides. • Fuel-efficient operation, resulting in low running costs and extended range on a single tank of fuel. • Classic Italian styling, offering a unique and charming aesthetic that stands out from modern motorcycles. • Affordable purchase price compared to larger displacement motorcycles of the era, making it accessible. • Relatively reliable for its age, given proper care and maintenance, providing dependable transportation.
👎
Cons (Disadvantages)

⚠️ Things to consider

• Low power output limits its suitability for long-distance travel or carrying heavy loads. • Limited top speed makes it unsuitable for highway use or keeping up with modern traffic. • Basic suspension and braking systems offer limited performance compared to contemporary motorcycles. • Spare parts can be difficult to source, requiring specialized knowledge or custom fabrication. • Vibrations from the small engine can become tiring on longer rides.
🪪
License Class (EU)

Rule of thumb: under 125cc / 15HP → A1, under 47HP → A2, above → A.

Fuel Economy & Running Costs

Estimated average for 64cc class: 75-100 mpg (2.5-3.5 L/100km)

🛡️
Insurance Class

Insurance grouping for Moto Guzzi Cardellino 65 Turismo (64cc):

  • 📋 Group 1-5 — entry-level, lowest premiums
  • 🧮
    Insurance Calculator (UK est.)

    Personalised premium estimate for the Moto Guzzi Cardellino 65 Turismo (UK rates):

    💡 Estimate based on UK market averages. For real quotes, compare on Compare the Market, MoneySuperMarket, GoCompare.

    🛒
    Buy New & Used

    Find new and used Moto Guzzi Cardellino 65 Turismo 1955 listings:

    💡 Third-party listings. MotoBike Info is informational only.

  • 👤 Final premium varies by rider age, history, location.
Sponsored Link

Similar Motorcycles

Comments (0)
Please log in to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one!

0

Comparison Results

Comparing...